“This concept of ‘crapitalism’ confuses and infuriates Lurr!”
“Surely they meant to fairly distribute the wealth”
“No, it says socialism for the rich with rugged individualism for everyone else. Behold.”
Because the rich have somehow tricked half the world into thinking they are part of that same smaller class, when in reality they are nowhere close to being such.
Yeah. Plus, Joanne and Cleetus are so sefish and so freaking stupid that they actually believe there’s a chance they’ll find oil in them there hills one day. God forbid you touch their theoretical oil.
Yes they have created collaborators
Cause bootlickers, that’s why.
Why eat what you can lick?
Oh man, I’m about to make apples taste 1000% better for you.
And here I was going to make a pussy joke.
How many licks does it take to get to the center of a wealthy pop?
Working class neighbor who earns 0.1% more: *sweats profusely*
That’s not how it works.
In theory.
How would you handle a situation where in addition to “eat the rich”, people start to say “eat the working class supporters of the rich” or “eat the families of the working class supporters of the rich” or “eat the ‘eat the rich’ dissenters”?
If you answer “that’s never gonna happen,” I hope you’re right because I hate to say “I told you so.”
Apologist for the rich
So you actually took a strawman and shoved it down a slippery slope into a victim complex with a condescending “you’ll see!” flourish at the end! Wow.
That would have been HILARIOUS with just a modicum of self awareness, but instead it’s just sad 🤦
If you answer “that’s never gonna happen,” I hope you’re right because I hate to say “I told you so.”
- I fail to see how this is condescending. I just don’t want witnessing a tragedy where innocents die because of guilt-by-association.
- What stuff should I be aware of that I missed? I can’t read your mind.
- Calling my question a strawman implies you’re certain this “slippery slope” will never happen.
Steelman instead of Strawman my friend.
Yeah you don’t get indoctrinated until your second yacht
Because the rich can afford to stop them.
This is, unfortunately, a sentiment that has worked out rather poorly throughout history
Would you eat something that rotten?
Removed by mod
That cookbook’s going to be complicated. Rich white woman is going to be like trying to cook fugu. No no don’t slice open the face it’s full of botulism.
I ask the same thing Lrrr. They taste like pork.
Because we filled up on nuts at the reception.
You know what they say, the working class are from Mars and the rich are from Venus.
*Omicron Persei 7 and Omicron Persei 9.
Because my bed is so so comfy
Wouldn’t that be… illegal or something? I’m not an expert tho
Because then nobody would have a job, and have to resort in eating each other sadly.
Last time they ate the rich afterwards everybody starved to death because nobody was left knowing how to do thing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1930–1933
And the funny thing about it: When some poor had learned how to do things again those poor became the new rich.
Capitalism might be bare of morale but at least it cares for paying customers in spite of all alternatives.
Yeah, it sure shows.
