Apple Watch faces potential import ban in the US | The International Trade Commission has found Apple in violation of a bloody oxygen tracking patent owned by Masimo.::Apple could be potentially facing an Apple Watch import ban in the US for infringing a blood oxygen tracking patent owned by Masimo.

  • radix@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    >“bloody oxygen tracking patent”

    >click on post

    >“blood oxygen tracking patent”

    :/

    • flames5123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Huh? They still provide the “you have this variant linked to this disease” thing. What are you talking about?

      • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, they aren’t allowed to do genetic testing for actual genetic diseases, like the mutation in this gene causes Huntington’s Disease or something. They are allowed to comment on vague things like genetic modifiers of common diseases (like, people with this change have a relative risk of heart disease is 2.5% higher than the population).

        They also don’t have the capability to do that genetic testing for actual diseases safely or accurately. Or else they would have no problems complying with fda regulations that are in place for medical tests for good reason. There’s tons of companies that do genetic testing, even whole exome and whole genome, it’s easier than ever to get genetic testing done relatively cheaply. Those companies also have to do things like provide access to genetic counselors and followup family testing. 23andme doesn’t want to do any of this stuff, they just wanted to charge you cash directly and plop a bunch of information directly in front of someone that’s tough even for doctors and genetic counselors to interpret, and all the many many problems that would have led to.

  • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think Apple would sue if Masimo was copying their watch, yeah?

    “Masimo has wrongly attempted to use the ITC to keep a potentially lifesaving product from millions of U.S. consumers while making way for their own watch that copies Apple,” an Apple spokesperson told Reuters. “While today’s decision has no immediate impact on sales of Apple Watch, we believe it should be reversed, and will continue our efforts to appeal.”

    • Heisme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They have:

      “Apple has separately sued Masimo for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. It has called Masimo’s legal actions a “maneuver to clear a path” for its own competing smartwatch.”

  • Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would your watch need to measure your blood oxygen? It’s just a sophisticated data harvesting machine.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like half the point of smartwatches is health vital tracking…. Blood oxygen is a major vital sign.

      • Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why wouldn’t they measure your vitals compared to what content you’re looking at and sell that to data brokers, or even use it for their own AI training?

        • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because it’s all generated, encrypted, and stored on device.

          Unless you have some evidence that they’re lying about out their data security, in which case you should probably sue about it and get rich as fuck.

        • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          What steps do you, personally, take to protect yourself against that from literally any device you use that has an internet connection?

          • Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I manually go through my computers and remove data harvesting bloatware with command prompt. I cover my cameras with tape when not in use. I use open source privacy focused applications. I drive an older car with no internet functionality. Bluetooth stays off 24/7. Phone (an older model) stays in airplane mode when not in use. All privacy settings are set to the best possible configurations. I avoid large chain stores that conduct heavy surveillance and shop locally instead. I use cash when possible.

            I’m interested, what tips do you have to stay more digitally private?

            • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Nobody cares except a few hardcore security zealots. It’s simply not consequential and having health data is far more important.

    • TheGoldenV@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Boy oh boy I hope you didn’t post that from a mobile phone. It’ll blow your noodle to know what that harvests.

      • RelentlessArts@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why what do the GrapheneOS team harvest that I don’t already consent to by installing the OS?

        • there1snospoon@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just… stop. Clearly 99% of all smart devices aren’t marketed to you. The rest of us will enjoy our devices and you can be that one guy in the corner of the room saying “they don’t know that I actually have privacy”

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re trying to be edgy, what if I told you there need to be features that would entice people to buy something in order to harvest data, and that pulse oximetry could be one of them without much hardware cost?