Because you now did it to yourself.

  • TheFonz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Two independents from conservative states that barely align with democrats. Why do you handwave this away so easily???

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      One of the independents is Bernie Sanders.

      Manchin and Sinema were both capital-D Democrats at the time they did everything you wanted.

      • TheFonz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They did NOT do everything. It fact we barely got them to do much. All this information is publicly available. Their voting records are available to see. None of this is hidden. They are the primary reason most of the bills that DID pass were almost completely neutered because they were negotiated down or stalled. This also happened only a few years ago. We are not talking about last decade.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They did NOT do everything.

          God damn, you’re bad at reading. First you act like Manchin and Sinema were independents when they were blocking shit for you, and now you’re ignoring parts of my sentence to make it contrary to what I said.

          Manchin and Sinema did everything that YOU WANTED THEM TO DO. They blocked legislation. That’s all you wanted.

          There is no point in arguing with you since you selectively pretend to be unable to read.

          • TheFonz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m not sure where the confusion is. My whole point in that those two shits (Manchin and Sinema) did not vote with the party and blocked legislation. They worked against progressive legislation. Many of the bills had progressive policies that were taken out because of those two idiots. I’m for progressive policies but even I recognize the Democratic party was held hostage by these two shits. I thought I was clear???

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m not sure where the confusion is. My whole point in that those two shits (Manchin and Sinema) did not vote with the party and blocked legislation. They worked against progressive legislation. Many of the bills had progressive policies that were taken out because of those two idiots.

              Right. We voted for Democrats. We gave Democrats the seats they needed. They didn’t vote in the lockstep Democrats demand from their voters.

              I’m for progressive policies

              But you make excuses for the party that always finds the no votes to kill them.

              but even I recognize the Democratic party was held hostage by these two shits. I thought I was clear???

              Held hostage. Sure. Oh no. Just enough Democrats voted against legislation that party leadership didn’t want. There are always enough Manchins.

              Now selectively forget how to read again.

              • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I don’t know what your argument is any more. Sinema and Manchin were always moderates. Democrats can’t perform miracles if they don’t have enough votes. Do you have any suggestions how they could have done it with just a slim majority held back by two moderates? What’s your plan? I’m listening.

                  • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I don’t understand. Did I lobby any insults at you at any point?

                    I just asked how could any meaningful legislation pass without a super majority and you accuse me of lying. My thesis hasn’t changed since post #1. Do you have any suggestions for how the democratic party could have effected change without a super majority? I’m really curious. We’d all like to know.